The longitudinal data set



ITEM

Typical data matrix

The longitudinal data set is stored in the file rochmig.dat. The data matrix for a typical individual is of the form:

Case number 50016
Move/No move 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
Age 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Year 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
Duration of stay (dur) 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1
Education (ed) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Children age 11-12 (ch1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Children age 13-14 (ch2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Children age 15-16 (ch3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Children age 17-18 (ch4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marital status (msb) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Marital status (mse) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Employment status (esb) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0
Employment status (ese) 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0
Occupational status (osb) 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 0 0
Occupational status (ose) 71 71 71 71 71 71 0 0 0
Marital break-up (mbu) *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Remarriage (mrm) *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
First marriage (mfm) *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marital status (msb1) {msb collapsed} *** 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Promotion to manager (epm) *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Obtaining a job (eoj) *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Employment status (esb1) {esb collapsed} *** 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4
Promotion to service class (ops) *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Occupation (osb1) {osb collapsed} *** 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Marital status (msb2) {msb1 collapsed} *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Employment (esb2) {esb1 collapsed} *** 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
Occupation (osb2) {osb1 collapsed*** 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Occupation (osb3) {osb2 collapsed} *** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

The core variables are marked in bold; other variables have been derived from these and are marked with asterisks. Some are new variables which indicate a change in marital, occupational or employment status during the year, - these are seen as important in explaining the dynamics of migration - , others are simplified versions of the core variables, formed by collapsing categories.

For a detailed description of the variables click here.


ITEM

Limitations of the data set

ITEM The data is restricted to those residing in the study area in 1986; it includes individuals who had moved to Rochdale before 1986, but not those who had moved away. Therefore those who had left cannot be compared with those remaining.

ITEM The data contains the complete, or nearly complete histories for those aged sixty at the time of interview but only short histories for younger respondents.

ITEM Therefore the data are comparatively sparse on migration behaviour during later career stages and during the more distant past. For earlier periods the maximum age is reduced.

ITEM There is no information on retirement or post-retirement migration.

ITEM As the data were not specifically collected for studying migration, some explanatory variables which may be important, such as family income for instance, were not available.

ITEM The reliability of retrospective data may also be called into question (Dex 1995; Dex and McCulloch 1998).


Do we need such a large and complex longitudinal data set to answer the substantive questions?

We can sum up the number of migrations for each individual and produce a summary data set, with one line of information for each individual. This will give cross-sectional information for the years up to 1985.

What questions can be answered by cross-sectional analysis?

Next:Cross-sectional data

Home page

Contents

Previous